Jan 02, 2014 Just please don't blame Apple if your hackintosh doesn't work. For a mere three thousand dollars you can get quite the kickass mac pro. If that sounds like a lot of money now, talk to me when you're on your third motherboard exchange or your 11th kernel panic. Dec 21, 2017 - While Philip's been editing on his 2013 Mac Pro, his three and a half. So when MSI approached him to try out some of their kit in a. The speed of the system today given the cost vs the competition, and the. Who edit on a Mac but still use a PC for the rendering grunt work. You write your own software? Download original pacman for mac. The is undoubtedly a slick piece of hardware with some very impressive specs, but it also comes with an equally impressive price tag. And while we can drool over specs day in and out, what really matters for most working professionals are real world results. This great video pits the new iMac Pro against a Mac Pro, MacBook Pro, and a Windows PC. EaseFab Video Converter Mac software enables you to convert all popular video files to fit your portable media players with the best video settings. Besides, the program supports exporting various. Check out the reviews about EaseFab Video Converter for Mac. Easefab Studio, Share Wonderful Software! I never use quicktime player to convert video formats anymore. EaseFab is faster than REAL-TIME! Wish I had this years ago. For torrents or videos you have backed up on your computer, NONE COMPARE. Free download DVD Ripper, Blu-ray Ripper, Video Converter, etc. Tools for Windows and Mac from EaseFab Studio. EaseFab's Video Converter for Mac is so easy to work with it's unbelievable. Working with video converters in general is a pain, but this software is super easy and what makes it even more amazing is that this is used for a Mac. Coming to you from Colin Smith over at, this great video examines the performance of the new iMac Pro in real world tests with apps like Premiere Pro and Photoshop. At the end of the day, particularly for professional creatives who do all their work themselves, performance is really about time, as time is money. If an investment in a computer results in significantly reduced wait times when working with large files or projects, that extra cost could very well be worth it. In the case of the iMac Pro, there are definitely times where it leaps ahead of the competition, but also times when it's neck and neck or it even falls behind. Whether that is worth the increased price tag over the other options is up to you. First of all: atm it is known that Photoshop is poorly optimized for multicore processors, and you really don't need a workstation of that caliber for photo editing. Second, talking about the video editing part, where a machine like that could be useful: Alienware? They are overpriced as hell, you are paying for colored lights and brand instead of the components, a while ago I've made a price comparison with a custom built machine and you can easily build a computer with a Threadripper 1950x that MURDERS that Xeon for the price of the iMac Pro (and before somebody asks, yes, counting a professional monitor and peripherals). The iMac on the other end offers a good value compared to other 'branded' workstations, however it's only true for the basic model while the upgraded versions are simply ridiculously overpriced (sometimes the price for the upgraded part is double the MSRP of that component). Not entirely true, as not all photographers exclusively use Photoshop for photo editing. LR will use multiple cores during export. Capture One Pro will use all cores and the GPU for nearly every task, especially when exporting. Another thing that's changed, is Intel has optimized their 6, 8 and 10-core CPUs to work at higher frequencies with 1 or 2 core tasks using Turbo Boost 3.0 mode. The 7820x has the same 4.5GHz Turbo Boost as the 4-core 7700K. The 6-core 8700K now has a turbo boost of 4.7GHz. At the time of my build, 7820x was less expensive than the 6-core 8700K (which is the new Photoshop King in most tasks), so I went with the 7820x. This 8-core CPU performs nearly the same as the old 7700K in most tasks, and much better in a few tasks. Mostly tasks I'll never use.
0 Комментарии
Оставить ответ. |
АвторНапишите что-нибудь о себе. Не надо ничего особенного, просто общие данные. Архивы
Март 2019
Категории |